4.4 Article

Development, validation, and application of a multimatrix UHPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of Datura-type alkaloids in food

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2023.2253550

关键词

Tropane alkaloids; LCMS/MS; validation; food; food supplements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantitative UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of atropine and scopolamine in various food products. The method was validated and successfully applied in the analysis of different commercial foods. Results showed that only a small percentage of food samples contained atropine and scopolamine, with the highest concentrations found in herbal infusions and spice mixtures.
quantitative ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of tropane alkaloids (TAs), atropine and scopolamine, in a variety of food products. The sample preparation of cereal-based food, oilseeds, honey, and pulses consisted of a solid-liquid extraction with an acidified mixture of methanol and water, while an additional step of solid-phase extraction on a cation-exchange sorbent was introduced in the treatment of teas and herbal infusions, aromatic herbs, spices and food supplements. The limits of quantification of the method varied from 0.5 to 2.5 mg kg(-1). Apparent recovery was in the range of 70-120%, and repeatability and intermediate precision were below 20%. The method was successfully applied in a proficiency testing exercise as well as in the analysis of various commercial foods. Only 26% of the analysed food samples contained one or both TAs. The mean concentrations for atropine and scopolamine amounted to 21.9 and 6.5 mg kg(-1), respectively, while the maximum concentrations were 523.3 and 131.4 mg kg(-1), respectively. Overall, the highest levels of TA sum were found in an herbal infusion of fennel and a spice mix containing fennel and anise seeds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据