4.2 Article

Stocking fish in inland waters: Opportunities and risks for sustainable food systems

期刊

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12656

关键词

aquaculture; culture-based fisheries; fisheries enhancement; fisheries management; habitat degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stocking is a commonly used tool in inland fisheries management, but it has both opportunities and risks. This paper highlights the current practices of fish stock enhancement in inland waters for food fisheries, examines the potential synergies with aquaculture, and provides an outline framework for responsible management of fish stock enhancement.
Stocking is one of the foremost tools in the inland fisheries management toolbox, but it comes with both opportunities and risks. Stocking is often used as compensation for depleted wild populations, particularly where recruitment processes have been disrupted, but it can introduce disease, disrupt community structures, reduce genetic integrity, and cause conflicts between fishery stakeholders. Despite its widespread use, examples of effective stocking for food fisheries in inland waters are sparse in the peer-reviewed literature. Nevertheless, it is well established that stocking is frequently used to maintain fish yield, so there is a need to conduct the practice in a robust manner that minimises the potential risks. This paper serves as the front matter for a special section of Fisheries Management and Ecology focused on fresh waters feeding the world, which resulted from two panel sessions, one focused on aquaculture and one focused on stocking, hosted by the international InFish research network (https://infish.org/). The paper highlights current practices of fish stock enhancement in inland waters for food, examines potential synergies and interactions of stock enhancement programmes with aquaculture, and provides an outline framework for responsible management of fish stock enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据