4.7 Article

A novel perlucin-like protein (PLP) protects Litopenaeus vannamei against Vibrio harveyi infection

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2023.108932

关键词

Litopenaeus vannamei; C-type lectins; Vibrio harveyi; Immune-related genes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel C-type lectin (CTL) called perlucin-like protein (PLP) was identified in Litopenaeus vannamei. PLP could be activated in response to Vibrio harveyi infection and could bind and agglutinate various bacteria. PLP was involved in stabilizing the expression of immune-related and apoptosis genes and reducing bacterial load in the hepatopancreas.
C-type lectins (CTLs), as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), play an important role in the innate immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei. In this study, a novel CTL, named perlucin-like protein (PLP), was identified from L. vannamei, which shared homology sequences of PLP from Penaeus monodon. PLP from L. vannamei was expressed in the hepatopancreas, eyestalk, muscle and brain and could be activated in the tissues (hepatopancreas, muscle, gill and intestine) after infection with the pathogen Vibrio harveyi. Bacteria (Vibrio alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. harveyi, Streptococcus agalactiae and Bacillus subtilis) could be bound and agglutinated by the PLP recombinant protein in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Moreover, PLP could stabilise the expression of the immune-related genes (ALF, SOD, HSP70, Toll4 and IMD) and apoptosis gene (Caspase2). The RNAi of PLP could remarkably affect the expression of antioxidant gene, antimicrobial peptide genes, other CTLs, apoptosis genes, Toll signaling pathways, and IMD signaling pathways. Moreover, PLP reduced the bacterial load in the hepatopancreas. These results suggested that PLP was involved in the innate immune response against V. harveyi infection by recognising bacterial pathogens and activating the expression of immune-related and apoptosis genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据