4.5 Article

Experimental Assessment of Emission Factors from Fires in the Built Environment Including Scaling Effects

期刊

FIRE TECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-023-01440-5

关键词

Emission factors; Fire emissions; Fire effluents; Scaling effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concern is growing for the environmental impact of fires and the fire implications of sustainability choices made in the built environment as human population grows. This paper explores the potential to use small scale testing, such as the cone calorimeter and fire propagation apparatus, to develop emission factors for estimating larger scale fire emissions. The findings indicate that there is potential to develop emission factors for CO and CO2 emissions, although more work is needed to similarly characterize a broad range of species.
Concern for the health of the natural environment is growing as human population grows. Recently, renewed attention has been given to the environmental impact of fires and the fire implications of sustainability choices made in the built environment. To properly understand the environmental impact of fires, however, it is crucial that we can estimate fire emissions. This paper explores the concept of fire emissions and emission factors and investigates the potential to use small scale testing to develop emission factors for fire emissions. The findings show that there is a potential to use dynamic tests such as the cone calorimeter (CC, ISO 5660) and fire propagation apparatus (FPA, ISO 12136) to develop emission factors to estimate larger scale fire emissions, at least for CO and CO2 emissions. While there is a spread of data from between the CC or FPA and the medium scale tests, this is of the same order or less than the spread between the two small scale tests. The spread in emission factor values from the various tests is smaller for CO2 than for CO and greatest for small CO-emission factors (< 10 g/kg). More work is needed to similarly characterise a broad range of species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据