4.4 Review

Fortune telling: metabolic markers of plant performance

期刊

METABOLOMICS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-016-1099-1

关键词

Breeding; Metabolic marker; Metabolomics; Plant performance; Prediction

资金

  1. 'Agence Nationale de la Recherche' (ANR) through SUNRISE [ANR-11-BTBR-0005]
  2. 'Agence Nationale de la Recherche' (ANR) through AMAIZING [ANR-10-BTBR-0001]
  3. BREEDWHEAT [ANR-10-BTBR-0003]
  4. DROPS [FP7-244374]
  5. MetaboHUB [ANR-11-INBS-0010]
  6. PHENOME [ANR-11-INBS-0012]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-BTBR-0003, ANR-10-BTBR-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In the last decade, metabolomics has emerged as a powerful diagnostic and predictive tool in many branches of science. Researchers in microbes, animal, food, medical and plant science have generated a large number of targeted or non-targeted metabolic profiles by using a vast array of analytical methods (GC-MS, LC-MS, H-1-NMR ...). Comprehensive analysis of such profiles using adapted statistical methods and modeling has opened up the possibility of using single or combinations of metabolites as markers. Metabolic markers have been proposed as proxy, diagnostic or predictors of key traits in a range of model species and accurate predictions of disease outbreak frequency, developmental stages, food sensory evaluation and crop yield have been obtained. Aim of review (i) To provide a definition of plant performance and metabolic markers, (ii) to highlight recent key applications involving metabolic markers as tools for monitoring or predicting plant performance, and (iii) to propose a workable and cost-efficient pipeline to generate and use metabolic markers with a special focus on plant breeding. Key message Using examples in other models and domains, the review proposes that metabolic markers are tending to complement and possibly replace traditional molecular markers in plant science as efficient estimators of performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据