4.6 Review

Low concentration atropine and myopia: a narrative review of the evidence for United Kingdom based practitioners

期刊

EYE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02718-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of myopia is increasing worldwide. Studies have investigated the use of atropine to control myopia progression, weighing the benefits against the side-effects. Atropine 0.05% appears to be more effective than atropine 0.01% in managing myopia progression.
The prevalence of myopia is increasing across the world. Controlling myopia progression would be beneficial to reduce adverse outcomes such as retinal detachment and myopic maculopathy which are associated with increased axial length. Pharmacological control of myopia progression with atropine has been investigated since the 19th century and the benefits of slowing myopia progression are considered against the side-effects of near blur and photophobia. More recently, randomised trials have focused on determining the optimum concentration of atropine leading to low-concentration atropine being used to manage myopia progression by practitioners across the world. Currently, in the United Kingdom, there is no licensed pharmacological intervention for myopia management. The aim of this review is to interpret the available data to inform clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review of the literature and identified peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials using the search terms 'myopia' and 'atropine', limited to the English language. We identified two key studies, which were the Atropine in the Treatment Of Myopia (ATOM) and Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP). Further studies were identified using the above search terms and the references from the identified literature. Atropine 0.01% has a modest effect on controlling axial length progression. Atropine 0.05% appears to be superior to atropine 0.01% in managing myopia progression. There is a dose-dependent rebound effect when treatment is stopped. Atropine is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective intervention. Treatment would be needed for several years and into adolescence, until axial length progression is stable. (sic)(sic)患(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)断(sic)升.(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)膜(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)黄斑(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)眼轴(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)19(sic)(sic)(sic), 专(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)药(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)缓(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)处(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)畏(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)浓(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)浓(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)疗(sic)(sic)(sic)药(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)床(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)顾(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)索(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)限(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)疗(sic)(sic)(ATOM)(sic)(sic)浓(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)疗(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(LAMP)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)索(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), 0.01% (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)眼周(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).0.05% (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)疗(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)疗(sic)(sic)0.01% (sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)停(sic)疗(sic), (sic)剂(sic)(Sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)弹(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)耐(sic)(sic)(sic)?(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)措(sic).(sic)疗(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)眼轴(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)趋(sic)(sic)(sic).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据