4.6 Article

The Infectious Uveitis Treatment Algorithm Network (TITAN) Report 1-global current practice patterns for the management of Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella Zoster Virus anterior uveitis

期刊

EYE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02630-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents current expert practice patterns and formulates a consensus for the management of HSV and VZV anterior uveitis (AU) worldwide. A survey was conducted among uveitis experts from multiple countries, and consensus guidelines were developed based on the responses. The study identified specific characteristics for HSV and VZV AU and recommended treatment options.
AimsTo present current expert practice patterns and to formulate a consensus for the management of HSV and VZV AU by uveitis specialists worldwide.MethodsA two-round online modified Delphi survey with masking of the study team was conducted. Responses were collected from 76 international uveitis experts from 21 countries. Current practices in the diagnosis and treatment of HSV and VZV AU were identified. A working group (The Infectious Uveitis Treatment Algorithm Network [TITAN]) developed data into consensus guidelines. Consensus is defined as a particular response towards a specific question meeting & GE;75% of agreement or IQR & LE; 1 when a Likert scale is used.ResultsUnilaterality, increased intraocular pressure (IOP), decreased corneal sensation and diffuse or sectoral iris atrophy are quite specific for HSV or VZV AU from consensus opinion. Sectoral iris atrophy is characteristic of HSV AU. Treatment initiation is highly variable, but most experts preferred valacyclovir owing to simpler dosing. Topical corticosteroids and beta-blockers should be used if necessary. Resolution of inflammation and normalisation of IOP are clinical endpoints.ConclusionsConsensus was reached on several aspects of diagnosis, choice of initial treatment, and treatment endpoints for HSV and VZV AU. Treatment duration and management of recurrences varied between experts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据