4.7 Article

Automated defect identification for cell phones using language context, linguistic and smoke-word models

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120236

关键词

Cell phones; Linguistics; Language context; Defect discovery; Smoke words; Word2vec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel approach that integrates word2vec and BERT models, along with domain-specific lexicon approaches, to detect product defects for cell phones. Compared to existing studies, this approach shows better performance in detecting product defects and has been proven to be effective in the Apple iPhone and Samsung cell phone industry.
Product defects are a widespread concern for manufacturers when conducting quality and customer relationship management. Prior approaches addressed many electronic products however cell phones are still unexplored. Moreover, prior work mainly focused on the lexicon, probabilistic graphic, failure mode, and effect analysis models but the utilization of word embeddings and language models are not explored. State-of-the-art contextual word embeddings and language models generate automated features and both are very effective in capturing the semantic and contextual dimensions of the text. This paper addresses these dimensions and proposes a novel approach that integrates word2vec and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models with smoke and domain-specific lexicon approaches to detect product defects for cell phones. Compared to existing studies, smoke and domain-specific approaches surpass the traditional sentiment methods. Moreover, BERT and word2vec presented the best performance with the logistic regression model by achieving an accuracy of 90% on training data and 84% on validation data. A case study in the Apple iPhone and Samsung cell phone industry proves the predominant performance of our approach and provides great potential in defect and customer relationship management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据