4.5 Review

Efficient screening strategies for severe combined immunodeficiencies in newborns

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2023.2244879

关键词

NBS; neonatal; newborn screening; SCID; severe combined immunodeficiency; T-cell receptor excision circles; TREC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SCID is a severe form of immune system disorder that affects both cellular and humoral immunity. Without proper treatment, infants with SCID will die within the first year of life. Therefore, screening for SCID in newborns is of great importance.
IntroductionSevere combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is one of the most severe forms of inborn errors of immunity (IEI), affecting both cellular and humoral immunity. Without curative treatment such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or gene therapy, affected infants die within the first year of life. Due to the severity of the disease, asymptomatic status early in life, and improved survival in the absence of pretransplant infections, SCID was considered a suitable candidate for newborn screening (NBS).Areas coveredMany countries have introduced SCID screening based on T-cell receptor excision circle (TREC) detection in their NBS programs. Screening an entire population is a radical departure from previous paradigms in the field of immunology. Efficient screening strategies are cost-efficient and balance high sensitivity while preventing high numbers of referrals. NBS for SCID is accompanied by (actionable) secondary findings, but many NBS programs have optimized their screening strategy by adjusting algorithms or including second-tier tests. Harmonization of screening terminology is of great importance for international shared learning.Expert OpinionThe expansion of NBS is driven by the development of new test modalities and treatment options. In the near future, other techniques such as next-generation sequencing will pave the way for NBS of other IEI. Exciting times await for population-based screening programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据