4.3 Article

Low profile endografts for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 753-767

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2239148

关键词

abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; endograft; low-profile endograft; reintervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study systematically reviewed the literature on complications and reintervention rates of patients treated with EVAR using different low-profile endografts (LPE). The results showed comparable long-term survival and freedom from reintervention rates among the three LPEs, but the Zenith device had the highest rates of limb stenosis/kinking, while the Incraft device had the lowest occurrence of type III endoleak.
Introduction Favorable midterm outcomes have been reported with the use of low-profile endografts (LPE), but long-term data is still needed. Furthermore, it is unclear if each of these LPE may have advantages over the other, which may, in turn, affect the outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature about complications and reintervention rates of patients submitted to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using LPE.Matherials and methods A literature search was conducted including articles that reported 30-days and follow-up mortality, complications, and reintervention rates of patients treated with EVAR using Incraft (Cordis), Zenith LP/Alpha (Cook Medical Inc) and Ovation (Endologix) endografts.Results 36 papers were evaluated, reporting results of 582 patients treated with Zenith device, 1211 with Incraft and 3449 with Ovation. During follow up, similar survival and freedom from reintervention rates were reported among the various types of endograft both at 1 and 3 years. The incidence of limb stenosis/kinking was significantly higher in patients treated with Zenith LP/Alpha (2.1%, P = 0.008), while the Incraft device had a significantly lower proportion of type III endoleaks (P < 0.001).Conclusions Long-term survival and freedom from reintervention rates were comparable among the three LPEs. The Cook Zenith device had the highest rates of limb stenosis/kinking, while the Incraft device had the lowest occurrence of type III endoleak.Prospero Registration number: CRD42022315875

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据