4.5 Review

Dietary antioxidants and lifespan: Relevance of environmental conditions, diet, and genotype of experimental models

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112221

关键词

Aging; Ageing; Longevity; Bioactive compounds; Nutrient -sensing pathways; Hormesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increase in life expectancy in current societies has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in healthspan, which is a significant socio-economic problem. It has been suggested that manipulating the aging process can delay the onset of age-related chronic disorders, as these pathologies share age as the primary underlying risk factor. The accumulation of molecular damage is one of the widely accepted theories of aging. According to the oxidative damage theory, antioxidants are expected to slow down aging, extending both lifespan and healthspan. This review examines studies on the effects of dietary antioxidants on lifespan in different aging models, and discusses the evidence supporting their antioxidant activity as anti-aging mechanisms. Furthermore, possible reasons for discrepancies in the reported results are evaluated.
The rise of life expectancy in current societies is not accompanied, to date, by a similar increase in healthspan, which represents a great socio-economic problem. It has been suggested that aging can be manipulated and then, the onset of all age-associated chronic disorders can be delayed because these pathologies share age as primary underlying risk factor. One of the most extended ideas is that aging is consequence of the accumulation of molecular damage. According to the oxidative damage theory, antioxidants should slow down aging, extending lifespan and healthspan. The present review analyzes studies evaluating the effect of dietary antioxidants on lifespan of different aging models and discusses the evidence on favor of their antioxidant activity as anti-aging mechanisms. Moreover, possible causes for differences between the reported results are evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据