4.7 Article

Evaluating enzymatic synthesis of small molecule drugs

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 138-147

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.11.006

关键词

Metabolic engineering; Computational biology; Predictive biochemistry; Pharmaceutical production; Drug synthesis

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1044008]
  2. NSF [CBET-0835800]
  3. Northwestern McCormick School of Engineering
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA060553] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There have been many achievements in applying biochemical synthetic routes to the synthesis of commodity chemicals. However, most of these endeavors have focused on optimizing and increasing the yields of naturally existing pathways. We sought to evaluate the potential for biosynthesis beyond the limits of known biochemistry towards the production of small molecule drugs that do not exist in nature. Because of the potential for improved yields compared to total synthesis, and therefore lower manufacturing costs, we focused on drugs for diseases endemic to many resource poor regions, like tuberculosis and HIV. Using generalized biochemical reaction rules, we were able to design biochemical pathways for the production of eight small molecule drugs or drug precursors and identify potential enzyme-substrate pairs for nearly every predicted reaction. All pathways begin from native metabolites, abrogating the need for specialized precursors. The simulated pathways showed several trends with the sequential ordering of reactions as well as the types of chemistries used. For some compounds, the main obstacles to finding feasible biochemical pathways were the lack of appropriate, natural starting compounds and a low diversity of biochemical coupling reactions necessary to synthesize molecules with larger molecular size. (C) 2015 International Metabolic Engineering Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据