4.7 Article

Transitions between Nanoporous crystalline α and β forms of poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) oxide (PPO)

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112532

关键词

alpha and beta guests; Co-crystallization; Crystal phase orientations; PPO films; XRD; FTIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoporous-crystalline (NC) alpha and beta forms of Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) oxide (PPO) can include low-molecular-mass guests. The transitions between alpha and beta forms can be achieved by sorption of beta-guests and alpha-guests. The loss of crystalline phase orientation occurs during the transitions and is only observed for guests that are good PPO solvents.
Nanoporous-crystalline (NC) alpha and beta forms of Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) oxide (PPO), exhibit two different large helix conformations, both being suitable for intrahelical low-molecular-mass guest inclusion. alpha -> beta and beta -> alpha transitions can be achieved by sorption of liquid beta-guests and alpha-guests (i.e., of guest inducing beta and alpha forms by solution casting and by sorption in amorphous PPO), respectively. Both alpha -> beta and beta -> alpha transitions occur with complete loss of possibly present crystalline phase orientations (both axial and planar). Moreover, the reported data show that transitions between the two phases and the associated loss of crystalline phase orientation occur only for guests being good PPO solvents. These observations rule out the possibility of solid-solid transitions while can be rationalized by mechanisms involving a local dissolution of the NC phases. This local polymer dissolution is followed by host/guest co-crystallization with the helical conformation being different from the starting one and more suitable to host the used guest. These data fully confirm complete separation between the two NC phases while rule out the hypothesis of a continuum of NC phases between two limit ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据