4.7 Article

B7-H3 but not PD-L1 is involved in the antitumor effects of Dihydroartemisinin in non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 950, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175746

关键词

NSCLC; Immune checkpoint; B7-H3; PD-L1; Artemisinin derivatives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), an active metabolite of artemisinin, shows anticancer activities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by suppressing tumor growth and inducing CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration. It inhibits the expression of B7-H3, which is involved in cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis, rather than PD-L1. These findings suggest that DHA's antitumor effects in NSCLC may be attributed to B7-H3 blockade, indicating a potential combination with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy.
Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), an active antimalaria metabolite derived from artemisinin, has received increasing attention for its anticancer activities. However, little is known about the anticancer mechanisms of DHA, although the existing data define its antimalaria effects by producing excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS). In this study, we showed that DHA effectively suppresses in vitro and in vivo tumor growth of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without perceptible toxicity on heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney tissues. Of note, DHA inhibited the expression of B7-H3 rather than PD-L1, whereas overexpression of B7-H3 completely rescued DHA's inhibition on cell proliferation and migration of NSCLC A549 and HCC827 cells. B7-H3 overexpression also largely inhibited DHA's induction on the apoptosis of the two cell lines. Furthermore, DHA treatment led to increased infiltration of CD8+ T Lymphocytes in the xenografts as compared with that of negative controls. Taken together, our results suggest that B7-H3 but not PD-L1 is involved in the antitumor effects of DHA in NSCLC, which may be indicative of an effective B7-H3 blockade and further combination with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据