4.7 Article

Hybrids of carbonic anhydrase and cyclooxygenase inhibitors attenuate cardiac hypoxic inflammatory injuries

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 950, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175751

关键词

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; Cyclooxygenase inhibitor; Cardiac inflammation; Myocardial hypoxic acidosis; Drug side effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to effectively attenuate myocardial injury caused by hypoxic and inflammatory injury, researchers designed and synthesized a kind of anti-inflammatory compounds by coupling cyclooxygenase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The compounds were found to be structurally stable and had two enzymatic inhibition activities. By inhibiting the overexpression of carbonic anhydrase under hypoxia, the compounds can regulate the acidic microenvironment to inhibit hypoxic injury and improve the anti-inflammatory effect of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor. This study provides a new strategy for the treatment of cardiac inflammation accompanied by hypoxia.
Cardiac inflammation is easily accompanied by hypoxia, while hypoxia-induced injury and microenvironmental variations limit the efficacy of common anti-inflammatory drugs. In order to effectively attenuate myocardial injury caused by hypoxic and inflammatory injury, we designed and synthesized a kind of anti-inflammatory compounds by coupling cyclooxygenase (COX) and carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors, and evaluated the ac-tivity and their mechanism in vitro and in vivo. It was found that these compounds were structurally stable and had two enzymatic inhibition activities. By inhibiting the activity of overexpressed CA under hypoxia, the acidic microenvironment can be regulated to inhibit the hypoxic injury, in which the pH-dependent primary drug resistance can be overcome to improve the anti-inflammatory effect of the COX inhibitor. Consequently, this study provides a new strategy for the treatment of cardiac inflammation accompanied by hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据