4.7 Article

Evaluation the injectability of injectable microparticle delivery systems on the basis of injection force and discharged rate

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.06.017

关键词

Injectability; Microparticle; Discharged rate; Injection force; Injection speed; Needle length

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the important factors affecting the injectability of microparticle delivery systems and establish a suitable injection system with lower injection force and higher discharge rate. The effects of various parameters were evaluated, and the results showed that vehicle viscosity and injection speed have varying effects on discharge rate and injection force, while particle size and needle gauge have substantial influence on injectability. The evaluation method developed in this study can promote the clinical translation of microparticle delivery systems.
Background: Subcutaneous injection of biopharmaceutical agents or microparticles is challenging due to issues with low injection efficiency and high residual amounts. Objective: This study aimed to determine the important factors affecting the injectability of microparticle delivery systems, establish a suitable injection system with lower injection force and higher discharge rate, and eventually develop a reliable injectability evaluation system for injectable microparticle delivery systems in vitro andin vivo. Methods: The effects of various parameters, including particle size, injection speed, concentration of microspheres suspension, vehicle viscosity, needle length and gauge were evaluated by measuring the injection force and discharge rate. The characteristics of microparticles and rheological measurement of the suspension systems were studied. A design of experiment approach was utilized to evaluate the interaction between the microsphere suspension, vehicle viscosity and needle gauges. Both in vitro sieve tests andin vivo tests in rats were conducted to evaluate injectability. Results: The in vitro test results showed that the vehicle viscosity and injection speed have varying effects on discharge rate and injection force, respectively. Particle size and needle gauge have substantial influence on injectability, larger particle size and smaller needle gauges resulting in poor injectability, while the needle gauge was found to have the greatest influence on injectability. Levonorgestrel (LNG) microsphere and glass bead were relatively uniform spherical, the glass bead had extremely smooth surface; while mesoporous silica had irregular shape. The settling rate of glass bead was the fastest, which was about 18 times faster than the LNG microsphere. The CMC-Na had a poor interaction with the LNG microspheres, glass bead and mesoporous silica and showed basically Newtonian behavior in the shear rate range of 0.1 s- 1-100 s-1. When shear rate increased to more than 100 s-1, no obvious shear thinning behavior was observed. CMC-Na formed a nodule structure with whether LNG microspheres or the glass beads, which were much lower than that with the mesoporous silica in static state, among which the glass beads were the weakest. The viscosity of the suspension increased with the rising of the volume fraction of particles. Fundamentals of hydrodynamics in capillaries were referenced, such as Navier-Stokes Law equation, Krieger-Dougherty (K-D) equation, Hagen-Poiseuille equation. The best results achieved was using a suspension concentration of 120-240 mg /mL and a viscosity of 60 cP at 20 degrees C with 23-gauge needles. The optimized conditions were verified in vivo tests. It was proven that the LNG microsphere suspen-sion had a good injectability when injected into subcutaneous tissue of rats. Conclusion: The injection system of injectable microparticle delivery system with lower injection force and higher discharge rate was established and the evaluation method was suitable for the injectability evaluation both in vivo and in vitro. Improved injectability would promote the clinical translation of microparticle delivery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据