4.7 Article

Mathematical programs with distributionally robust chance constraints: Statistical robustness, discretization and reformulation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 313, 期 2, 页码 616-627

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.10.020

关键词

Stochastic programming; Chance constrained optimization; Distributional robustness; Statistical robustness; Discretization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses mathematical programs with distributionally robust chance constraints (MPDRCC), where the ambiguity set is determined by general moment information. The qualitative statistical robustness of MPDRCC is studied from the contaminated data-driven viewpoint. Discrete approximation of MPDRCC is also investigated to achieve computational tractability, with established convergence results. A reformulation of the approximated problem under standard assumptions is presented, which is then applied to approximately solve MPDRCC based on the convergence results. Two applications are reported, showing the practicality and effectiveness of the statistical robustness assertion and the discrete approximation scheme.
In this paper, we consider mathematical programs with distributionally robust chance constraints (MPDRCC), where the ambiguity set is given by the general moment information. From the contaminated data-driven viewpoint, we first study the qualitative statistical robustness of MPDRCC. Then, motivated by the computational tractability, we investigate the discrete approximation of MPDRCC. The corresponding convergence results of the optimal value and the optimal solution set of the discrete approximation problem are established. After that, a reformulation of the discrete approximation problem is presented under standard assumptions, which is applied to solve MPDRCC approximately according to the above convergence results. Finally, two applications are reported, and some numerical results show that the statistical robustness assertion and the discrete approximation scheme are practical and effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据