4.7 Article

Development of novel PEX5-PEX14 protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors based on an oxopiperazine template

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115587

关键词

Protein-protein interaction inhibitors; Peptidomimetics; & alpha;-Helical mimetics; Oxopiperazine; Trypanocidal inhibitors; Structure-based drug design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are important targets for small molecule drugs, but can be challenging to inhibit. In this study, a new class of peptidomimetic scaffolds was developed to target the PEX5-PEX14 PPI, which plays a critical role in glycosome biogenesis and is a potential target for drugs against Trypanosoma infections. The designed peptidomimetics inhibited the PEX5-TbPEX14 PPI and exhibited cellular activity against T. b. brucei, providing a promising approach for the development of trypanocidal agents and helical mimetics as PPI inhibitors.
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) constitute an important but challenging class of molecular targets for small molecules. The PEX5-PEX14 PPI has been shown to play a critical role in glycosome biogenesis and its disruption impairs the metabolism in Trpanosoma parasites, eventually leading to their death. Therefore, this PPI is a po-tential molecular target for new drugs against diseases caused by Trypanosoma infections. Here, we report a new class of peptidomimetic scaffolds to target the PEX5-PEX14 PPI. The molecular design was based on an oxopi-perazine template for the a-helical mimetics. A structural simplification along with modifications of the central oxopiperazine scaffold and addressing the lipophilic interactions led to the development of peptidomimetics that inhibit PEX5-TbPEX14 PPI and display cellular activity against T. b. brucei. This approach provides an alternative approach towards the development of trypanocidal agents and may be generally useful for the design of helical mimetics as PPI inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据