4.7 Article

Synthesis and evaluation of dihydrofuro[2,3-b]pyridine derivatives as potent IRAK4 inhibitors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115616

关键词

Innate immunity; Inflammation; IRAK4 inhibitor; Pharmacokinetics; dihydrofuro[2; b ]pyridine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of IRAK4 inhibitors based on a dihydrofuro[2,3-b]pyridine scaffold were developed. Compound 38 showed improved clearance and excellent biochemical potency against IRAK4. It also demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines and showed potential for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.
Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) is a key regulator to control downstream NF-KB and MAPK signals in the innate immune response and has been proposed as a therapeutic target for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Herein, a series of IRAK4 inhibitors based on a dihydrofuro[2,3-b]pyridine scaffold was developed. Structural modifications of the screening hit 16 (IC50 = 243 nM) led to IRAK4 inhibitors with improved potency but high clearance (Cl) and poor oral bioavailability, as exemplified by compound 21 (IC50 = 6.2 nM, Cl = 43 ml/min/kg, F = 1.6%, LLE = 5.4). Structure modification aimed at improving LLE and reducing clearance identified compound 38. Compound 38 showed significantly improved clearance while maintained excellent biochemical potency against IRAK4 (IC50 = 7.3 nM, Cl = 12 ml/min/kg, F = 21%, LLE = 6.0). Importantly, compound 38 had favorable in vitro safety and ADME profiles. Furthermore, compound 38 reduced the in vitro production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in both mouse iBMDMs and human PBMCs and was orally efficacious in the inhibition of serum TNF-& alpha; secretion in LPS-induced mouse model. These findings suggested that compound 38 has development potential as an IRAK4 inhibitor for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据