4.5 Article

Performance assessment of wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for modeling aeolian two-phase flow

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 291-301

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2023.04.008

关键词

Aeolian two-phase flow; Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation; Particle statistics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wall models have less influence on particle velocities for the same subgrid stress model, but strongly affect the particle volume fraction and mass flux. The combination of dynamic Smagorinsky model and integral model performs the best in this case. The influence of particles on LES models needs urgent research.
Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) is an effective way to improve the computational efficiency of two-phase flow. Based on a wall-resolved large-eddy simulation (WRLES) of aeolian two-phase flow at sand-free friction Reynolds number of Re & tau; = 4200, the performance of different subgrid stress (SGS) and wall models in modeling aeolian two-phase flow are checked. Three classical eddy-viscosity-type SGS models are employed, i.e., Smagorinsky (SMAG) model, dynamic Smagorinsky (DYNA) model and scale-dependent dynamic (SDDY) model. The involved wall models are two equilibrium wall models and a non-equilibrium wall model. By comparing the WMLES and WRLES of sand-laden flow, it is found that wall models have less influence on particle velocities for the same SGS model. On the contrary, the particle volume fraction and mass flux strongly depend on the SGS and wall models. Although, the performance of WMLES with different models varies from case to case, the combination of dynamic Smagorinsky model and integral model performs the best in this case. By analyzing the particle and fluid stress, we suggest that the influence of particles on LES models is in urgent need.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据