4.7 Article

Mechanical analysis of the interaction between a semi-infinite Griffith crack and its coplanar plastic zone

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.104982

关键词

Crack; Dislocations; Shielding; Plastic zone; Pile-up of dislocations; Continuous dislocation distribution; Image distribution; Dislocation nucleation; Stress analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the analytical solution for the equilibrium conditions between a dislocation pile-up and a loaded crack, taking into account the influence of image distributions. The study highlights the effects of image forces on the stress intensity factor, dislocation nucleation conditions, and criteria for crack propagation. It also discusses the control of dislocation free zone size in semi-brittle and ductile materials, as well as the modification of Griffith criteria in the presence of plastic deformation.
This paper presents the complete analytical solution of the equilibrium conditions between a dislocation pile-up and a loaded crack. Contrary to previous models, the image distributions (forces) are included in this calculation. Their influence on the effective stress intensity factor, on the dislocation nucleation conditions and on the criteria for crack propagation are underlined. In semi-brittle materials the size of the dislocation free zone is controlled by material characteristics, as expected from the literature. However, in ductile materials its size is controlled by a mathematical limitation resulting from introduction of image forces. If plastic deformation takes place, the Griffith criteria must be modified by adding additional work required to separate dislocations from their images to the surface energy and the plastic work done to develop the plastic zone. A detailed analysis of the stress distribution inside and outside the pile-up is presented. Within the plastic zone the total stress is not constant while outside and close to the limits a square root variation with distance is noticed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据