4.7 Article

Integrating machine learning and environmental variables to constrain uncertainty in crop yield change projections under climate change

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126917

关键词

Yield projections; Crop modelling; Extreme climate event; Machine learning model; Model uncertainty; Climate change impact

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers improved crop yield projections by integrating a dynamic linear model (DLM) and a random forest machine learning model (RF) with global gridded crop models (GGCM). The RF+GGCM models showed higher accuracy and reduced uncertainties compared to using GGCM alone. The main influencing factors for maize yield were chilling days, crop pests and diseases, and drought, while for soybean, they included crop pests and diseases, tropical days, and drought. This study provides a robust framework to assess the impact of future climate change on crop yields.
Robust crop yield projections under future climates are fundamental prerequisites for reliable policy formation. Both process-based crop models and statistical models are commonly used for this purpose. Process-based models tend to simplify processes, minimize the effects of extreme events, and ignore biotic pressures, while statistical models cannot deterministically capture intricate biological and physiological processes underpinning crop growth. We attempted to integrate and overcome shortcomings in both modelling frameworks by integrating the dynamic linear model (DLM) and random forest machine learning model (RF) with nine global gridded crop models (GGCM), respectively, in order to improve projections and reduce uncertainties of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) yield projections. Our results demonstrated substantial improvements in model performance accuracy by using RF in concert with GGCM across China's maize and soybean belt. This improvement surpasses that achieved using DLM. For maize, the GGCM+RF models increased the r values from 0.15 to 0.61-0.64-0.77 and decreased nRMSE from approximately 0.20 to 0.50-0.13-0.17 compared with using GGCM alone. For soybean, the models increased r from 0.37 to 0.70-0.54-0.70 and decreased nRMSE from 0.17 to 0.35-0.17-0.20 compared with using GGCM alone. The main factors influencing maize yield changes included chilling days (CD), crop pests and diseases (CPDs), and drought, while for soybean the primary influencing factors included CPD, tropical days (based on exceeding a maximum temperature), and drought. Our approach decreased uncertainties by 33-78% for maize and by 56-68% for soybean. The main source of uncertainty for GGCM was the crop model. For GGCM+RF, the main source of uncertainty for the 2040-2069 period was the global climate model, while the main source of uncertainty for the 2070-2099 period was the climate scenario. Our results provide a novel, robust, and pragmatic framework to constrain uncertainties in order to accurately assess the impact of future climate change on crop yields. These results could be used to interpret future ensemble studies by accounting for uncertainty in crop and climate models, as well as to assess future emissions scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据