4.7 Article

Can crop modelling, proximal sensing and variable rate application techniques be integrated to support in-season nitrogen fertilizer decisions? An application in corn

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126854

关键词

Maize; Nitrogen; Fertilization; DSSAT; Proximal sensing; Variable rate application

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen fertilization in corn is often based on uniform rates and yield goals without considering the spatial and temporal variability of yield potential. This study presents two site-specific N fertilization approaches, integrating crop simulation models, seasonal forecasts and proximal sensing, which led to higher yields, N efficiency and gross margin in 2019 but not in 2020. The inconsistency in 2020 was due to the underestimation of N leaching events caused by major rainfall events not present in historical or seasonal forecast datasets.
Nitrogen (N) fertilization in corn is often based on uniform rates and yield goals without considering the spatial and temporal variability of yield potential. It is well documented how uniform N rates lead to low N use effi-ciencies and environmental issues, resulting in reduced profit for farmers. Several site-specific approaches have been proposed to capture the yield spatial variability and adjust N rates to the actual crop nutrient requirements. The current study presents two original, site-specific N fertilization approaches, where two approaches at inte-grating crop simulation models, seasonal forecast and proximal sensing were tested across two corn seasons (2019 and 2020) in a field with significant spatial variability. In the first approach, top dressing N prescription maps were determined using the DSSAT crop model run with historical weather data, while in the second one, the maps were determined coupling DSSAT with seasonal forecasts and proximal sensing. Compared to the uniform fertilization treatment, both model-based approaches led to higher yields, N efficiency and gross margin in 2019 but not in 2020. The 2020 season was characterized by several major rainfall events, which were not present in the historical or seasonal forecast datasets. This inconsistency led to a substantial underestimation of the N leaching events in both model-based methodologies and consequently to higher-than-needed N fertilizer recommendations. Future studies should therefore focus on identifying ways to provide accurate seasonal esti-mates of extreme weather events to enable crop models to provide better N recommendations. In addition, the integration of proximal and remote sensing data into the crop model should be tested later in the season when spatial variability in crop N status peaks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据