The revolution of beat-to-beat wireless bidirectional communication between intra-cardiac devices

Article Medicine, General & Internal

A Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker

Reinoud E. Knops et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the safety and performance of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system, which demonstrated the ability to provide atrial pacing and reliable atrioventricular synchrony for 3 months after implantation. This technology is of significant importance for the broad application of dual-chamber pacing therapy.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2023)

添加到收藏夹

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up

Mikhael F. El-Chami et al.

Summary: The Micra leadless VVI pacemaker showed lower rates of reinterventions and chronic complications compared to transvenous VVI pacing in a real-world study of US Medicare patients, with no difference in all-cause mortality at 2 years.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Wireless Communication Between Paired Leadless Pacemakers for Dual-Chamber Synchrony

Daniel J. Cantillon et al.

Summary: This preclinical study demonstrates the chronic performance of implant-to-implant communication that achieves synchronous, dual-chamber pacing with 2 leadless pacemakers, achieving a success rate of 99.2%.

CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Letter Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Primary Results on Safety and Efficacy From the LEADLESS II-Phase 2 Worldwide Clinical Trial

Vivek Y. Reddy et al.

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

Michael Glikson et al.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker

Jonathan P. Piccini et al.

Summary: This study compared patient characteristics and complications between patients implanted with leadless VVI and transvenous VVI pacemakers. Despite significant differences in patient characteristics, patients with leadless VVI pacemakers had higher rates of pericardial effusion and/or perforation but lower rates of other device-related complications and revisions at 6 months.

JAMA CARDIOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems