4.5 Article

Valorization of viticulture waste as verjuice powders: their characterization, storage stability and application in beverage formulation

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 249, 期 11, 页码 2897-2910

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-023-04336-4

关键词

Verjuice; Microencapsulation; LC-MS/MS; FTIR; Waste; Storage stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, unripe grapes were used to produce verjuice powder, which was encapsulated with maltodextrin and pectin. The powders were evaluated for their properties and retention of phenolic compounds. The results showed that pectin encapsulation had higher phenolic retention compared to maltodextrin encapsulation. This study suggests that waste from viticulture can be transformed into valuable powders for potential applications and contribute to sustainable agriculture.
Unripe grapes are released as a waste product during viticulture. In this study, verjuices extracted from unripe grapes were encapsulated with maltodextrin (MD) and pectin (PEC) to convert into powder. The powders were evaluated for their physicochemical, phenolic properties, antioxidant capacity, encapsulation efficiency, and storage stability. The results showed that the percentage of encapsulation efficiency was significantly affected by the amounts of MD and PEC (p < 0.05), with the encapsulation efficiency ranging from 67.58 to 75.37%. The highest amount of fumaric acid was detected in verjuice and the powder, followed by caffeic acid, gallate, catechin, and epicatechin. It was found that most of these compounds were retained in the powders. Verjuice powder with pectin had significantly higher phenolic retention than powder with MD, implying that polyphenols were better retained after spray drying. With this subject studied for the first time, it can be predicted that the waste from viticulture will be transformed into powders with high-added value and find potential applications and contribute to sustainable agriculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据