4.7 Article

Facing trade-offs: The variability of public support for climate change policies

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 244-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.020

关键词

Goal conflict; Policy goals; Climate policy; Public support; Trade-offs; Survey experiment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Policy support often focuses on isolated policy goals, but in reality, policies have multiple implications. This study examines how people react when policies have negative implications for other valued goals, considering both their support and certainty. Using survey experiment data from Germany in 2020, we find that people decrease their support and certainty when faced with negative implications for vulnerable groups. This effect is influenced by individuals' climate change concern and support for government assistance. These findings contribute to understanding policy decision-making and have implications for measuring public support and developing effective climate policies.
Policy support is often measured by asking respondents to evaluate policies linked to an isolated policy goal. However, in real-world settings, policies usually have multiple implications. We study how people react when policies have negative implications for other valued goals, considering both their level of support and the certainty of their choices. Using survey experiment data collected in Germany in 2020 (N = 2233) that measures people's support for climate policies with or without information about negative implications for different societal groups, we find that people decrease their policy support and become less certain about their choices when faced with negative implications for vulnerable groups. This effect is partially moderated by people's climate change concern and their support for government assistance for such groups. We thus contribute to the understanding of people's policy decision-making, with implications for the measurement of public support and the development of effective climate policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据