4.7 Article

Underestimated ammonia vehicular emissions in metropolitan city revealed by on-road mobile measurement

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acf94a

关键词

ammonia; mobile measurement; DOAS; emission factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric ammonia (NH3) plays a significant role in the nitrogen cycle and has impacts on air quality, ecological balance, and climate change. The contribution of combustion-related NH3, especially from vehicular emissions, is increasing. Research found that high levels of NH3 concentrations were observed on roads in a metropolitan city, suggesting that previous estimates of urban vehicular NH3 emissions may have been underestimated.
Atmospheric ammonia (NH3) plays a significant role in the nitrogen cycle, and can have impacts on air quality, ecological balance and climate change. While NH3 associated with natural and agricultural processes has long been considered the primary source, the contribution of combustion-related NH3, particularly from vehicular emissions, keeps on the rise. We found that high on-road NH3 concentrations occurred in a metropolitan city based on mobile measurement, and inferred that urban vehicular NH3 emission was likely underestimated in the past. NH3 emission factors (EFs) were derived from ring roads and tunnels, showing levels 74% and 20% higher than the latest standard proposed by Euro VII, respectively. To quantify the underestimation, two methods based on car ownership and traffic flow were used to estimate the annual vehicular NH3 emission in Shanghai as 2.59 and 1.76 Gg, respectively, substantially surpassing the predicted results by the Dynamic Projection model for Emissions in China. Given these discoveries, we recommend that it is urgent and imperative to establish relevant national standards and limits aiming at regulation on vehicular NH3 emissions. And more representative EFs measurements should be adopted to improve the accuracy of inventory estimation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据