4.7 Article

Overhead AC powerlines and rain can alter the electric charge distribution on airborne particles-Implications for aerosol dispersion and lung deposition

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115834

关键词

High voltage power lines; Corona ions; Atmospheric aerosols; Particle charging; Atmospheric particle dynamics; Lung deposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a possibility that corona ions from high voltage power lines can increase the electrostatic charge on airborne pollutant particles, which may lead to an increased dose upon inhalation. However, most high voltage power lines do not significantly increase the charge magnitude, except for specific types that can increase net charge up to 15 times that of background levels. Rainfall can cause charge alteration comparable to the most extreme high voltage power lines measurement. Based on current evidence, it is unlikely that increased lung deposition will occur, considering the current adult lung model.
Corona ions from high voltage power lines (HVPL) can increase electrostatic charge on airborne pollutant par-ticulates, possibly increasing received dose upon inhalation. To investigate the potential increased risk of childhood leukemia associated with residence near alternating current (AC) HVPL, we measured the particle charge state and atmospheric electricity parameters upwind, downwind and away from HVPL. Although we observed noticeable charge state alteration from background levels, most HVPL do not significantly increase charge magnitude. Particular HVPL types are shown to have most effect, increasing net charge to 15 times that at background. However, the magnitude of charge alteration during rainfall is comparable with the most extreme HVPL measurement. On current evidence, based on the current adult lung model, we suggest that although charge is sometimes enhanced to levels which may alter atmospheric particle dynamics, increased lung depo-sition is unlikely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据