4.5 Article

Novel data on genotoxic assessment of bismuth sulfide nanoflowers in common carp Cyprinus carpio

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11653-4

关键词

Nanomaterials; Bismuth sulfide; Nanotoxicology; DNA damage; MN test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the genotoxic effects of bismuth sulfide nanoflowers on common carp were investigated. The results showed that low concentrations of bismuth sulfide nanoflowers had no significant toxic effects, but high concentrations caused DNA damage and nuclear abnormalities. Further studies are needed to fully assess the effects of bismuth sulfide nanoflowers on aquatic life.
The environmental impacts and risks of nanomaterials that are commonly used in different technologies are of great concern as their toxic effects on the aquatic ecosystem remain unclear. In this study, bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) nanoflowers (nfs) were synthesized using a microwave-based hydrothermal process, and their genotoxic effects were investigated in the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Bi2S3 nanoflowers were applied to common carp for 96 h. LC50 value (LC50 = 350 mg/L-1) was determined for acute toxicity with probit analysis, and three sublethal concentrations (35, 87, and 175 mg/L-1) were selected accordingly for genotoxicity tests. Such LC50 value - 350 mg L-1 for the common carp makes these nanoflowers non-toxic to aquatic organisms according to the EU-Directive 93/67/EEC classification scheme. Toxicological evaluations of the sublethal concentrations of Bi2S3 nanoflowers demonstrated that the 35 and 87 mg L-1 Bi(2)S(3)nfs groups were generally harmless and similar to the control group. Only the 175 mg L-1 Bi(2)S(3)nfs group had significant DNA damage frequency and nuclear abnormalities than the control and other Bi(2)S(3)nfs groups. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel data on genotoxicity reported for fish species exposed to Bi2S3 nanoflowers; however, further systematic studies need to be performed to fully estimate the effects of Bi2S3 nanoflowers on aquatic life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据