4.6 Article

Graphene oxide nanosheets immobilised on honeycomb pore structure of pomelo peel for enhanced removal of methylene blue

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-023-01765-8

关键词

Direct immersion immobilisation; Pomelo pulp sponge; Graphene oxide; Adsorption; Methylene blue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reported a simple, green immobilisation method for graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets using pomelo peel as a substrate. A GO/PL porous sponge was successfully prepared and exhibited excellent adsorption performance towards methylene blue (MB) in dye wastewater. The adsorption behavior was consistent with the Langmuir isotherm and quasi-secondary kinetic models.
Herein, for the first time, a simple, green, direct immersion immobilisation method is reported for graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets using pomelo peel (PL) as a substrate. A GO/PL porous sponge was successfully prepared and used to remove methylene blue (MB) from dye wastewater. Considering the porosity, hydrophilicity and elasticity of the PL, the PL was placed in a GO aqueous suspension through direct immersion immobilisation. The carboxyl and hydroxyl groups in the peel could effectively capture and immobilise the GO nanosheets. GO was adsorbed into the PL pores and dispersed throughout the PL. Finally, the prepared super-hydrophilic and elastic GO/PL exhibited excellent adsorption performance towards MB in dye wastewater. The adsorption results revealed that the adsorption behaviour was consistent with the Langmuir isotherm and quasi-secondary kinetic models. The maximum equilibrium adsorption capacity of GO/PL towards MB was 124.2 mg/g, exceeding the values obtained for most of the previously reported adsorbents. Moreover, after five consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles, GO/PL retained 75% of its initial adsorption capacity. Mechanistic analysis revealed that pore filling, electrostatic attraction, ion exchange and hydrogen bonding interactions are the primary driving forces facilitating MB adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据