4.6 Article

The potential influence of drains on the recent sediment characteristics and sedimentation rates of Lake Qarun, Western Desert, Egypt

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 82, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-023-11036-5

关键词

Drains; Mass accumulation rate; Grain size; Pb-210 and Cs-137 dating; Lake sediments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the sediment characteristics and estimate sedimentation rates of Lake Qarun due to the impact of the catchment. The results indicate that agricultural and industrial activities significantly influence grain size, sediment fractions, organic matter, and sedimentation rate.
In recent decades, Lake Qarun significantly suffered from the adverse effects of climate change (e.g., high evaporation rate) and human activities (e.g., industrial and agricultural development within the catchment). The objectives of this work were to (i) evaluate the sediment characteristics due to the impact of the catchment on the lake and (ii) estimate the sedimentation rates and relate these to historical changes in sediment. Three sediment Cores collected in 2018 from Lake Qarun were sliced into 5 cm intervals, and the radionuclides Pb-210 and Cs-137 were measured using a & gamma; spectrometer. The best validated models were the constant rate of supply (CRS) and the correct CRS(C-CRS). The results provide evidence that grain size, sediment fractions, organic matter (OM), organic carbon (OC) and sedimentation rate are all significantly influenced by agricultural and industrial activities.The geochronology models of Pb-210 indicated changes in the sedimentation process of Lake Qarun for 100 years that could be a vital source of information regarding changes in the regional and global hydrology. The estimated mean sedimentation rate based on the Pb-210 model is 0.45 & PLUSMN; 0.1 cm yr(-1) that extremely close to the sedimentation rate of the Cs-137 marker is 0.55 cm yr(-1) that indicates an excellent agreement in terms of sedimentation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据