4.7 Article

Price forecasts of ten steel products using Gaussian process regressions

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106870

关键词

Steel; Price forecast; Gaussian process regression; Chinese market

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study builds Gaussian process regression models to forecast the daily price index of ten major steel products in the Chinese market. The models provide accurate forecasts for the period of April 16, 2019 to April 15, 2021, with relative root mean square errors ranging from 0.07404% to 0.22379% and correlation coefficients above 99.9%. They outperform traditional econometric models and some other machine learning models as benchmarks.
Addressing price forecasting problems is an important exercise to policymakers and market participants in the resource business sector. In this work, we build Gaussian process regression models through cross validation and Bayesian optimizations over different kernels and basis functions for daily price index forecasting of ten major steel products in the Chinese market during July 20, 2011-April 15, 2021. This study aims to be the first attempt of exploring potential of Gaussian process regressions for price forecasting exercises with the coverage of all of the ten most important steel products that carry enormous economic significance in China as the largest steel consumer and producer in the world. The models offer accurate out-of-sample forecasts for the two-year period of April 16, 2019-April 15, 2021 with relative root mean square errors ranging from 0.07404% to 0.22379% across the ten price indices and correlation coefficients above 99.9%. They also lead to better forecast performance than some traditional econometric models and some other machine learning models as benchmarks. The models constructed here could be utilized by policymakers as part of policy design and implementations and by market participants as part of market assessments and decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据