4.7 Article

The effectiveness of building retrofits under a subsidy scheme: Empirical evidence from Switzerland

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113680

关键词

Energy efficiency; Retrofit; Policy analysis; Program evaluation; Energy savings; Cost-effectiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study based on a unique dataset of over 400 Swiss buildings examines the effectiveness of retrofitting subsidies. The findings indicate that retrofits can reduce energy consumption by 10-20%, and there is no significant difference in savings between subsidized and non-subsidized retrofits. Additionally, the amount of subsidy is correlated with a reduction in energy use. The study highlights the importance of policies enhancing retrofit depth and the need for further investigation of variation in retrofitting results.
While retrofitting buildings is one of the key elements of reaching climate and energy goals, it is burdened by insufficient speed and depth. Governments have attempted to accelerate deep retrofits via subsidies, but scant evidence exists on these policies' effectiveness. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of retrofitting subsidies by using a range of econometric techniques and a unique dataset of over 400 Swiss buildings with 19,000 observations over 11 years. Specifically, we analyze whether retrofits reduce energy consumption, whether subsidized retrofits lead to deeper retrofits than non-subsidized retrofits, and we differentiate the impact by subsidy amount. We find that retrofits reduce average energy use by 10-20%, that the achieved savings through subsidized and non-subsidized retrofits do not differ significantly, and that the subsidy amount is correlated to a reduction in energy use by 0.42 CHF per kWh over a period of 20 years. Our study highlights the importance of policies that enhance retrofit depth, the need to further investigate the causes of the wide variation in retrofitting results, and to consider effectiveness studies within the policy design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据