4.7 Article

An improved control strategy for a denitrification system using cooperative control of NH3 injection and flue gas temperature for coal-fired power plants

期刊

ENERGY
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128759

关键词

SCR denitrification; Control strategy; Coal power; Dynamic simulation; Operational flexibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a dynamic model of a coal-fired power plant is developed to evaluate the characteristics of a denitrification system during load cycling transient processes. An improved control strategy for the denitrification system is proposed, which effectively controls the NOx outlet concentration and NH3 slip.
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology is widely applied for flue gas denitrification in coal-fired power plants. Given the high penetration of renewable power, coal-fired power plants should operate flexibly to support power grid peak regulation. However, the flexible operation of coal-fired power plants often causes transient overshoot of the NOx outlet concentration and NH3 slip, and restricting the clean and reliable operation of coalfired power plants is a difficult issue. In this study, a dynamic model of the coal-fired power plant is developed, and the characteristics of a denitrification system during load cycling transient processes were evaluated. Then, an improved control strategy for the denitrification system using cooperative control of NH3 injection and flue gas temperature is proposed. Moreover, the control targets of NH3 injection and flue gas temperature are analytically derived. The NOx outlet concentration exceeds the standard value by 14.22 and 6.80 mg m  3, respectively, during the loading down processes and loading up processes with the original control strategy. When the improved control strategy is adopted, the NOx outlet concentration can be controlled to be smaller than the standard value, and the NH3 slip can be controlled well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据