4.7 Article

Catalytic mechanism of bi-alkali-metal-doped char in heterogeneous reduction of NO: A density functional theory study

期刊

ENERGY
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127999

关键词

Heterogeneous reduction; Bi-alkali-metal; Catalytic mechanism; Density functional theory; NO reduction; Char

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi-alkali-metal doping can significantly enhance the heterogeneous reduction rate of NO on char by promoting the dissociation of N-C and the combination of N-Na or O-K. The charge transfer and simulation paths analysis indicate that Na/K co-doping can reduce the energy barrier in the second and third steps of the reaction. This study provides new insights into the microscopic mechanism of NO-char reaction catalyzed by composite metal.
Bi-alkali-metal doping in char can significantly increase the heterogeneous reduction rate of NO. In this study, the effect of Na and K doping on heterogeneous reduction of NO by a char model with zigzag edge was systematically investigated by density functional theory. It was found with reduced density gradient and Mayer bond order analyses that alkali metals promoted the dissociation of the N-C and combination of N-Na or O-K. Moreover, bi-alkali-metal doping changed charge characteristics of the char, and promoted N-N formation and N-O breaking to shorten the reaction path. The simulation paths indicated that Na/K co-doping could reduce the energy barrier from 52 to 117 kJ/mol to less than 10 kJ/mol in the second and third steps of heterogeneous reduction. Both the mono- and bi-metals promoted reduction of NO on char. The kinetic calculation illustrated that the maximum fitted reaction activation energy is 179 kJ/mol for NO heterogeneous reduction at the edge of Na/K-doped char, whereas those for Na- and K-doped chars are 210 and 200 kJ/mol, respectively. This work provided a new and deep insight into the microscopic mechanism of NO-char reaction catalyzed by composite metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据