4.7 Article

Machine learning-aided prediction of nitrogen heterocycles in bio-oil from the pyrolysis of biomass

期刊

ENERGY
卷 278, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127967

关键词

Machine learning; Nitrogen-containing heterocyclics; Protein biomass; Pyrolysis; Bio-crude oil; Random forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine learning algorithms were used to predict and control the relative content of nitrogen heterocyclic compounds in bio-oil (NH_Oil) produced from biomass pyrolysis. The results showed that machine learning has significant potential in addressing this issue and guiding experimental studies.
Nitrogen heterocyclic compounds in bio-oil (NH_Oil) made from biomass pyrolysis such as pyrroles, pyrazines, and indoles, have a relative content of 0-30%. NH_Oil is a NOx precursor if bio-oil is used as a fuel, but it has a high potential as a precursor for high-value chemicals. However, predicting and controlling NH_Oil are challenging because of the complexity of the pyrolysis reaction system. Machine learning (ML) shows significant potential for addressing this issue. In this study, the relative contents of NH_Oil, 5-membered NH_Oil, 6membered NH_Oil, bio-oil yield, and the content of nitrogen in bio-oil were predicted using Random Forest and gradient boosting regression algorithms, with test regression coefficients values of 0.77-0.87 and 0.74-0.81 obtained for the former and latter ML models, respectively. Biomass N was the most important factor in predicting the bio-oil yield, whereas biomass N/C was the most significant of the other four targets and can be used as a proxy to assess the potential of biomass feedstock as fuel material or N-containing value-added chemical precursor. The optimization of pyrolysis parameters within ML models provides useful information for instructing experimental studies, indicating ML-aided bio-oil prediction and engineering show great promise and are worthy of further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据