4.7 Article

Effects of hydrogen-rich fuel injection on the states of the raceway in blast furnace

期刊

ENERGY
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127237

关键词

Hydrogen-rich fuel; Combustion performances; Blast furnace raceway; Computational fluid dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the characteristics of tuyere and raceway with hydrogen, natural gas, coke oven gas, and recycling top gas injection in blast furnace ironmaking. The simulation results show that coke oven gas combusts at the nearest point after leaving the gas lance, the gas velocity is highest at the tuyere, and the gas penetrability is strongest in all four cases. The highest maximum temperature is generated by combustion along the pulverized coal plume when recycling top gas and natural gas are injected.
The application of hydrogen-rich fuels such as hydrogen (H2), natural gas (NG), coke oven gas (COG), and recycling top gas (RTG) to blast furnace (BF) ironmaking can effectually reduce CO2 emissions. In this study, the characteristics in the tuyere and raceway with H2, NG, COG and RTG injection are compared. The simulation results show that COG starts to combust at the nearest place after leaving the gas lance, the gas velocity is highest at the tuyere and the penetrability of the gas is strongest in four cases; And the maximum temperature generated by combustion along the pulverized coal plume is the highest and the lowest, and the difference is higher as RTG and NG are injected from the gas lance. And the mole fraction of reducing gas produced in the raceway is the highest when NG is injected, followed by COG and RTG, and the least with H2 injection. Finally, the burnout of PC in the raceway from high to low: RTG injection (81.76%), H2 injection (79.86%), COG injection (78.04%), NG injection (75.72%) as the same rate of gas is injected. The research will provide a basis for the selection of hydrogen-rich fuel injection in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据