4.7 Article

Receiving energy analysis and optimal design of crystalline silicon solar cell array on solar airship

期刊

ENERGY
卷 282, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128988

关键词

Solar airship; Crystalline silicon solar cell; Receive energy; Sensitivity analysis; Genetic algorithm; Module size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the optimization of crystalline silicon solar array layout and finds that altering the size and layout of solar modules can significantly improve energy capture efficiency. Larger solar modules should be used in mid-low latitude regions, while smaller modules should be used in high latitude regions.
The energy of solar airships comes from solar array, and the amount of solar radiation received by solar array determines airship endurance. Many studies optimize the solar array layout to receive more solar radiation. However, most of them are for flexible thin-film array. The influence of the size of the currently commonly used crystalline silicon panels on received energy is not considered. This paper establishes a solar irradiation model and a receiving energy model suitable for crystalline silicon arrays. The effects of array shape, array location, and module size on the energy received by crystalline silicon solar arrays are analyzed at different flight latitudes. Then, an improved genetic algorithm is designed to optimize the array geometric parameters. The results show that altering the size and layout of solar modules significantly influences energy capture, with opposing trends between regions of mid-low latitudes and high latitudes. Airships flying at mid-low latitudes should adopt larger solar modules, while airships flying at high latitudes should adopt smaller ones. After the optimization using the proposed algorithm, the received energy of solar array is further enhanced. The optimization resulted in a 2% improvement at mid-low latitudes and an 18% improvement at high latitudes over conventional optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据