4.5 Article

Electrical Transport Characteristics of Vertical GaN Schottky-Barrier Diode in Reverse Bias and Its Numerical Simulation

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 16, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en16145447

关键词

gallium nitride; vertical Schottky-diode; reverse leakage; TCAD modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the temperature-dependent reverse characteristics (J(R)-V-R-T) of vertical GaN Schottky-barrier diodes with and without a fluorine-implanted edge termination (ET). Through temperature-dependent characterizations and technology computer-aided design modeling, we observed different levels of current in both forward and reverse biases for the ET and non-ET devices, indicating a change in the conduction mechanism for the observed leakages. We successfully fitted the measured J(R)-V-R-T characteristics of the non-edge-terminated device with the phonon-assisted tunneling model, while for the edge-terminated device, the reverse characteristics were modeled by considering the emission of trapped electrons and field caused by Poole-Frenkel emission at high temperature.
We investigated the temperature-dependent reverse characteristics (J(R)-V-R-T) of vertical GaN Schottky-barrier diodes with and without a fluorine-implanted edge termination (ET). To understand the device leakage mechanism, temperature-dependent characterizations were performed, and the observed reverse current was modeled through technology computer-aided design. Different levels of current were observed in both forward and reverse biases for the ET and non-ET devices, which suggested a change in the conduction mechanism for the observed leakages. The measured J(R)-V-R-T characteristics of the non-edge-terminated device were successfully fitted in the entire temperature range with the phonon-assisted tunneling model, whereas for the edge-terminated device, the reverse characteristics were modeled by taking into account the emission of trapped electrons at a high temperature and field caused by Poole-Frenkel emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据