4.5 Review

Electrokinetic transport phenomena in nanofluidics and their applications

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202300115

关键词

biosensing; electrokinetics; iontronics; nanochannel; separation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant progress has been made in understanding the electrokinetic phenomena in nanochannels over the past decades. The compatibility of nanochannel dimensions with the electric double layer has revealed unexpected behaviors, making nanofluidic electrokinetics highly promising in materials science, biology, and chemistry. This review provides an overview of recent developments in both fundamental and applied research, encompassing techniques for constructing nanochannels, investigations of the electric double layer, electroosmotic flow and electrophoresis of nanoparticles, as well as applications in iontronics, sensing, and biomolecule separation.
Much progress has been made in the electrokinetic phenomena inside nanochannels in the last decades. As the dimensions of the nanochannels are compatible to that of the electric double layer (EDL), the electrokinetics inside nanochannels indicate many unexpected behaviors, which show great potential in the fields of material science, biology, and chemistry. This review summarizes the recent development of nanofluidic electrokinetics in both fundamental and applied research. First, the techniques for constructing nanochannels are introduced to give a guideline for choosing the optimal fabrication technique based on the specific feature of the nanochannel. Then, the theories and experimental investigations of the EDL, electroosmotic flow, and electrophoresis of nanoparticles inside the nanochannels are discussed. Furthermore, the applications of nanofluidic electrokinetics in iontronics, sensing, and biomolecule separation fields are summarized. In Section 5, some critical challenges and the perspective on the future development of nanofluidic electrokinetics are briefly proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据