4.6 Article

Effect of silicone segment and imidization of polyimide-based binder on the electrochemical performances of high silicon content anode for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 466, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142991

关键词

Binder; Polyimide; Silicon anode; Lithium-ion batteries; Coulombic efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of silicon containing polyimides and polyamides were synthesized and characterized as binders for silicon-based anodes. It was found that the swelling ratio, adhesion strength, and hardness of the binders played important roles in the initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and capacity retention of silicon-based anodes. By optimizing the chemical structures and physical properties of the binders, high specific capacity, high initial Coulombic efficiency, and good capacity retention were achieved.
Binders are expected to play important role in silicon-based anode materials, but have not been well explored. In this work, a serial of silicon containing polyimides and polyamides have been synthesized and used as the binder of high content (80wt%) silicon anode. Systematic characterizations have been done on the chemical structures, physical properties of the binders, and the electrochemical performances of silicon-based anode. It was found that the swelling ratio, adhesion strength, and hardness plays important roles on the initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and capacity retention of silicon-based anode, and these parameters highly depend on the types and properties of binders. After optimizing the chemical structures and physical properties of the binders, a high specific capacity of 2941 mAh g-1, relatively high initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 83%, and good capacity retention of 85% (after 200 cycles) have been obtained. These results would help researchers to design new types of binders for silicon-based anode to improve its ICE and capacity stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据