4.6 Article

Spray coating of carbon nanoparticles as an effective and scalable method to enhance the performance of stainless steel anode in microbial electrochemical systems

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 473, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.143460

关键词

Spray coating; Stainless steel; Acetylene black; Surface modification; Microbial electrochemical systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spray coating of acetylene black nanoparticles onto stainless steel mesh can enhance its biofilm formation ability and current density, making it a promising electrode material for microbial electrochemical systems. The spray coating method is simple, cost-effective, and suitable for large-size stainless steel electrodes.
Modifying stainless steel (SS) surfaces with biocompatible materials is a practical approach to making SS an efficient electrode material for microbial electrochemical systems (MESs). However, a simple, cost-effective method to modify large-size SS is still missing. Here, we proposed to use spray coating to modify SS mesh (SSM) with acetylene black (AB) nanoparticles to make SSM an efficient anode material for MESs. The SEM images and Raman spectrum confirmed that AB nanoparticles could be uniformly coated onto the surface of SSM. The AB nanoparticles dramatically increased the specific surface area and biocompatibility of SSM. Conse-quently, when tested as the anode in MESs, the AB-coated SSM exhibited excellent biofilm formation ability, while the bare SSM saw inferior biofilm formation potential. Moreover, the current density achieved on the AB -coated SSM (1.95 +/- 0.1 mA/cm2) was orders of magnitudes higher than that achieved on the bare SSM (0.01 +/- 0.01 mA/cm2). Compared to other surface modification methods for SS, spray coating is simple, cost-effective, and most importantly readily for large-size SS electrodes. Therefore, spray coating of carbon nanoparticles holds excellent potential for scaling up SS electrodes for MESs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据