4.6 Article

Hydrocarbon-based membranes cost-effectively manage species transport and increase performance in thermally regenerative batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 467, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.143090

关键词

Waste heat; Flow battery; Membrane; Energy efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the performance of thermally regenerative batteries (TRBs) was examined with the use of different membranes. It was found that an inexpensive hydrocarbon CEM (Selemion CMVN) had low ammonia crossover and good performance. Additionally, a thin anion exchange membrane (Sustainion) showed high peak power density due to low resistance, but low average power density and energy density due to high ammonia flux. Techno-economic analysis showed that Selemion CMVN had the lowest levelized cost of storage.
Low-temperature heat (T<130 degrees C) can be utilized by thermally regenerative batteries (TRBs) for power production, allowing the thermal energy to be converted to storable chemical potential energy. However, TRBs suffer from high ohmic losses and ammonia crossover, which has slowed their development. In this study, we examined how the use of six different membranes influenced TRB performance, determined the most influential membrane parameters, and identified promising membrane candidates that cost-effectively increase TRB performance. Of the six membranes examined, an inexpensive, hydrocarbon CEM (Selemion CMVN) had low ammonia crossover without compromising resistance, resulting in good performance across all metrics studied. A thin anion exchange membrane (Sustainion, 50 microns) showed a high peak power density of 82 mW cm(-2) due to low resistance, but the average power density and energy density were low due to high ammonia flux. Full discharge curves using Selemion CMVN provided an average power density of 26 +/- 7 mW cm(-2) with an energy density of 2.9 Wh L-1, which were large improvements on previous TRBs. A techno-economic analysis showed that Selemion CMVN had the lowest levelized cost of storage ($410 per MWh) at an applied current density of 50 mA cm(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据