Contrasting effects of a novel biochar-microalgae complex on arsenic and mercury removal

Biochar and algae were commonly used as environmental-friendly adsorbents to treat wastewater contaminated with heavy metals. In the study, we used a biochar-microalgae complex of Coconut shell activated carbon (Csac) and Chlorella to evaluate and compare the adsorption ability of arsenic and mercury. The adsorption kinetic study showed that the adsorption efficiency of the biochar-microalgae complex for mercury was better remarkably than arsenic (about 74.84% higher in initial 1 min and 71.62% higher at adsorption equilibrium), which could be interpreted as the complex had excellent adsorption capacity for mercury. The new biochar-microalgae complex adsorbed up to 46.8 & mu;g & BULL;g � 1 of mercury at 100 & mu;g & BULL;L-1 concentration. FTIR and XPS indicated that the surface of biochar-microalgae complex adsorbent had abundant oxygen-containing functional groups that could provide active sites during the adsorption process, i.e.,-COOH,-OH and C-O-C et al. Compared with arsenic, the adsorption peaks of mercury moved or changed significantly, suggesting that the complex strongly adsorbed mercury and the main adsorption mechanisms were the ion exchange and complexation between functional groups and mercury ion. What must be emphasized was arsenic mainly existed as negative ions (AsO2-, AsO23-) in water, which was the reason for the weak adsorption capacity of the biochar-microalgae complex for arsenic. In short, the adsorption efficiency and performance of the biochar-microalgae complex was significantly higher than that of arsenic (p < 0.01), and the adsorption of mercury by biochar-microalgae was chemisorption based on the single molecular layer theory.

Automated summary

In this study, a biochar-microalgae complex of Coconut shell activated carbon (Csac) and Chlorella was used to evaluate and compare its adsorption ability for arsenic and mercury. The results showed that the complex had excellent adsorption capacity for mercury, with an adsorption efficiency 74.84% higher than that for arsenic. The main adsorption mechanisms were ion exchange and complexation between functional groups and mercury ion.