Trade-offs in non-native plant herbivore defences enhance performance

Non-native plants are typically released from specialist enemies but continue to be attacked by generalists, albeit at lower intensities. This reduced herbivory may lead to less investment in constitutive defences and greater investment in induced defences, potentially reducing defence costs. We compared herbivory on 27 non-native and 59 native species in the field and conducted bioassays and chemical analyses on 12 pairs of non-native and native congeners. Non-natives suffered less damage and had weaker constitutive defences, but stronger induced defences than natives. For non-natives, the strength of constitutive defences was correlated with the intensity of herbivory experienced, whereas induced defences showed the reverse. Investment in induced defences correlated positively with growth, suggesting a novel mechanism for the evolution of increased competitive ability. To our knowledge, these are the first linkages reported among trade-offs in plant defences related to the intensity of herbivory, allocation to constitutive versus induced defences, and growth.

Automated summary

Non-native plants experience less damage from herbivory compared to native plants, but they have weaker constitutive defenses and stronger induced defenses. The strength of constitutive defenses in non-natives is influenced by the intensity of herbivory, while induced defenses show the opposite trend. Additionally, investment in induced defenses is positively correlated with growth, which may contribute to increased competitive ability.