期刊
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110423
关键词
Greenspace exposure inequity index; Availability; Accessibility; Gini index; Landscape planning
An increasing number of studies are being conducted to improve the evaluation system for assessing greenspace exposure, but it is becoming more challenging to apply the evaluation index to landscape planning. In this study, a simple and actionable index system called the Greenspace Exposure Inequity index (GEII) is proposed for assessing the inequity of residents' greenspace exposure. The feasibility and effectiveness of GEII are tested using the case of Shanghai.
An increasing number of studies aim to improve and perfect the evaluation system for assessing greenspace exposure, yet it may also become more difficult to apply the evaluation index to landscape planning. Here we propose a simple but actionable index system - Greenspace Exposure Inequity index (GEII), for assessing the inequity of residents' greenspace exposure. GEII includes quantity-based availability, distance-based accessi-bility, and inequity-based Gini index for assessing the difference in greenspace exposure pattern. Then we selected Shanghai as a case to test the feasibility of GEII, analyzing the spatiotemporal evolution of greenspace exposure patterns, and further demonstrating the operability of the index. (1) Availability inequity for 2012, 2015, 2018, and 2021 was 0.603, 0.512, 0.514, and 0.489. The Gini index was between 0.4 and 0.6, and pre-sented a downward trend. (2) Accessibility inequity for 2012, 2015, 2018, and 2021 was 0.372, 0.368, 0.364, and 0.344. It can be clearly seen that it has changed less over ten years, but overall equality has been rising. (3) Using GEII to calculate the inequity of Shanghai, the Gini index for 2012, 2015, 2018, and 2021 was 0.392, 0.378, 0.373, and 0.357. The inequity of greenspace exposure assessed by GEII is gradually decreasing similarly, which illustrates the positive impact of urban greening policies. The GEII has three highlights: serviceability, human-oriented, and expandability. GEII abandons the complex computational evaluation procedures of numerous indicators and bridges the gap between theoretical research on inequity and practical planning, so GEII is of great value for alleviating the uneven exposure of residents' greenspace and scientifically optimizing landscape planning.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据