4.7 Article

Wide shelves as discriminators between hinterland tectonic and intra-basin rifting signals

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 620, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118347

关键词

South China Sea; rift basin; Tibet-Himalayan orogen; detrital zircon; wide shelf

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the critical role of a very wide shelf in the northern South China Sea in distinguishing signals related to hinterland tectonism and basin rifting, and shows that basin rifting is the main driver of detrital zircon (DZ) signal variations in the shelf sediments.
Decoding interwoven tectonic and climatic drivers in global source-to-sink systems remains a major challenge in Earth science. This study demonstrates that the very wide shelf in the northern South China Sea acted as a critical discriminator of signals related to hinterland tectonism and basin rifting. The rifting process is the main driver of variations of detrital zircon (DZ) signals in the succession of the wide shelf. DZ data show an increasing proportion of intrabasinal sediment source that is in phase with seafloor spreading and crustal extension (ca. 32-16 Ma), and then a gradual increase of extrabasinal source until the Pleistocene, in step with post-rifting thermal subsidence. These DZ variations are free of the strongest Cenozoic tectonism, the uplift of the eastern Tibet-Himalayan orogen since ca. 23 Ma, although this regional uplift dominated the DZ-signal variations in the entire deep-water basinal areas of the northern South China Sea basins fed by the Central Canyon of the Qiongdongnan Basin. Moreover, rising of global sea-level driven by the Miocene Climatic Optimum had little impact on sediment delivery in the shelf-to-basin system. The strong decoupling of DZ-variation trends between the shelf and the deep basin in this study underscores the importance of wide shelves in distinguishing different allogenic drivers in global source-to-sink systems.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据