4.7 Article

Active learning with effective scoring functions for semi-supervised temporal action localization

期刊

DISPLAYS
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2023.102434

关键词

Temporal action localization; Active learning; Scoring function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an active learning method called AL-STAL to address the issue of high labeling cost in action localization tasks. By selecting video samples with high informativeness and training the localization model, AL-STAL achieves superior performance compared to existing methods and demonstrates satisfying performance compared to fully-supervised learning on three benchmark datasets.
Temporal Action Localization (TAL) aims to predict both action category and temporal boundary of action instances in untrimmed videos, i.e., start and end time. Existing works usually adopt fully-supervised solutions, however, one of the practical bottlenecks in these solutions is the large amount of labeled training data required. To reduce expensive human label cost, this paper focuses on a rarely investigated yet practical task named semi-supervised TAL and proposes an effective active learning method, named AL-STAL. We leverage four steps for actively selecting video samples with high informativeness and training the localization model, named Train, Query, Annotate, Append. Two scoring functions that consider the uncertainty of localization model are equipped in AL-STAL, thus facilitating the video sample ranking and selection. One takes entropy of predicted label distribution as measure of uncertainty, named Temporal Proposal Entropy (TPE). And the other introduces a new metric based on mutual information between adjacent action proposals, named Temporal Context Inconsistency (TCI). To validate the effectiveness of proposed method, we conduct extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets THUMOS'14, ActivityNet 1.3 and ActivityNet 1.2. Experiment results show that AL-STAL outperforms the existing competitors and achieves satisfying performance compared with fully-supervised learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据