4.6 Article

Identification and characterization of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4) from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain in response to Vibrio alginolyticus and White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2023.104755

关键词

Scylla paramamosain; MKK4; Antimicrobial peptide; NF-& kappa;B; Innate immunity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two subtypes of MKK4, SpMKK4-1 and SpMKK4-2, were identified and their molecular characteristics and tissue distributions were analyzed. The expression of SpMKK4s was induced by WSSV and Vibrio alginolyticus challenges, and knocking down SpMKK4s resulted in decreased bacteria clearance capacity and antimicrobial peptide genes' expression. Moreover, overexpression of SpMKK4s activated the NF-κB signaling pathway. These findings provide insights into the role of MKK4s in the innate immunity of crabs.
Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4), serves as a critical component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, facilitating the direct phosphorylation and activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 families of MAP kinases in response to environmental stresses. In the current research, we identified two MKK4 subtypes, namely SpMKK4-1 and SpMKK4-2, from Scylla paramamosain, followed by the analysis of their molecular characteristics and tissue distributions. The expression of SpMKK4s was induced upon WSSV and Vibrio alginolyticus challenges, and the bacteria clearance capacity and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) genes' expression upon bacterial infection were significantly decreased after knocking down SpMKK4s. Additionally, the overexpression of both SpMKK4s remarkably activated NF-?B reporter plasmid in HEK293T cells, suggesting the activation of the NF-?B signaling pathway. These results indicated the participation of SpMKK4s in the innate immunity of crabs, which shed light on a better understanding of the mechanisms through which MKK4s regulate innate immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据