4.5 Article

2-Year Experience with Risankizumab in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis in Lazio Region, Italy

期刊

DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
卷 2023, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2023/9832296

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness and drug survival rate of risankizumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The results showed that over a period of 2 years, risankizumab demonstrated sustained clinical response and a favorable safety profile in psoriatic patients.
Background. Given the chronic relapsing, remitting course of psoriasis, data about long-term effectiveness may be useful to assess the maintenance of clinical response over time. Objective. To evaluate 2-year drug survival of risankizumab and identify any predictive factor of discontinuation for ineffectiveness. Materials and Methods. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in patients who initiated risankizumab between July 2019 and December 2020. PASI was measured at baseline and after 104 weeks. Any adverse event was registered during visits. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess baseline patients' characteristics that predicted clinical response. The drug survival analysis was descriptively performed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Results. 112 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were included. The overall median observation time was 35.3 months (26.7-37.3); the estimated survivor cumulative function at months 12 and 24 was 93.6% and 90.6%, respectively. No differences in BMI, disease duration, disease severity, or previous biological therapies were observed in patients who responded or did not respond to treatment. No significant adverse events were reported, but there was relapse of psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis in a patient. Conclusions. We found that risankizumab was associated with long-term effectiveness, and a favorable safety profile in a population of psoriatic patients was observed, over a period of 2 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据